One of the most common questions I get about my work revolves around the kinds of clients I see. People want to know how old the clients are, if they’re “freaks,” socially awkward, abusive, if they like X or Y, if I “like” them, if they treat me well, and so forth. Once people get over their initial shock about the fact that I do what I do, they invariably want to know about the people I see.
There’ve been quite a few escorts and prostitutes who’ve written about their work. And while all have talked about the kinds of people they’ve seen, they tend to focus on the unique or controversial clients (politicians and celebrities, especially). It’s somewhat rare to get a look at the broader demographics of the people most escorts see. The reason behind that is the almost universal vanilla-ness of the average client.
British escort Rebecca Dakin, in her new book, The Girlfriend Experience: My Fun and Adventurous Life as an Escort, describes the way she categorizes the clients she’s seen in her several years of being a professional companion. It’s the first time I’ve seen someone actually paint a defined picture of the people who’ve engaged her services. Rather than quote the entire section, I’ll just summarize (and paraphrase to an extent) how she breaks them down.
Ages 18-30
- Guys looking for no-strings sex and companionship. These guys who are a bit geeky and unsociable. Sometimes they’re virgins.
- Arrogant guys who get off on paying for sex.
- Clingy guys who believe the escort relationship might evolve into a romantic relationship
Ages 30-40
- Guys who’re a bit lonely at home, usually married but have decided to see an escort because they don’t feel they get enough attention at home.
- Guys who’ve hit a mid-life crisis and need a bit of a pick-me-up to make themselves feel attractive again.
- Guys who’re too busy to socialize and don’t have the time to build relationships.
- Older single guys looking for a younger girlfriend.
- Older single guys lacking confidence.
Ages 40 and Over
- Guys who like to be seen with younger, attractive women.
- Older guys who need a bit of a pick-me-up, sometime addicted to seeing escorts (typically hobbyists, or punters)
- Guys who are seeking companionship and affection because their wives aren’t giving them any at home. They love their wives, but crave the affectionate touch of a woman.
- Guys who like the idea of being with a sexy, younger woman, usually obsessed with physical looks of the escort.
In a very broad sense, I suppose those could represent my clients as well. The average client for most escorts (in the US) is a white male, in his mid-40s, and rather vanilla in his preferences. I have had my share of most of those she outlines above (except for the virgins – see below).
From a more narrow perspective, though, my clients tend to be a bit younger than average, perhaps in their mid to late 30s. Many of my clients also represent something other than vanilla sexual preferences. As you’ve probably picked up from my writing, I tend to be a bit more aggressive in bed, and actually prefer rougher, more aggressive sex, so this is fine with me. Having said that, I can do straight suck and fuck like any other escort.
While I don’t keep detailed statistics about the proclivities of each client, there are some trends that have obviated themselves over the past 18 months or so.
The overwhelming majority of my clients have been white males, with a few Hispanics, Asians and a smattering of other cultural backgrounds sprinkled in from time to time. I have yet to see an African American client (I did have one person tell me he was African American at the outset. When I told him that was fine, he indicated he was really white and just testing me – he didn’t want to spend time with someone who wasn’t open minded enough to disavow race as a disqualifying factor. As it turned out, we were unable to work out an agreeable meeting time, so I never saw him).
The youngest guy I’ve seen has been 22 and the oldest in his late 50s. I’ve not seen any disabled or differently-abled clients. I’ve seen one woman professionally. I haven’t had the pleasure(?) of taking anyone’s virginity thus far.
And while I’ve seen a few men who’ve been rather arrogant, demanding or pushy (I never allow second appointments with those types), I’ve not had the misfortune of having an assholish, misogynistic, disrespectful, or violent client. Yet. Pretty much everyone has been respectful of me and my time. Though I have a 100% satisfaction guarantee with my services, I’ve yet to have the first client even hint that they might be less than happy after an appointment, even when I’ve indicated to them I won’t see them a second time (which doesn’t happen until they try to book again, btw).
I don’t see anyone I can identify as a hobbyist (punters, for you British types) as a general rule. I’ve made the occasional exception in the past, but negative experiences with a couple of them lately (including one I had planned to see but have since canceled on) have led me to refuse to see them if I know they like to accumulate escort notches on their bedposts (or belt). Hobbyists just tend to have a different mindset than the kind of client I prefer to see. They call them hobbyists for a reason, and I don’t really care to be just one more girl in their list of conquests.
I’ve seen a wide range of occupations, but the majority of them seem to be doctors and dentists, lawyers, business executives, and traveling businessmen or salesmen. I’ve seen a couple of people I know to be politicians, pharmaceutical company reps, educators, authors/writers, a couple of professional athletes, an actor or two, a handful of blue collar workers, and the occasional college student. My lone female client has a media job in the eastern part of the country.
I’ve seen clients who save their money up specifically to see me as well as those who are multi-millionaires and think nothing of dropping hundreds or thousands of dollars a pop to spend time with me. One client spent more on my services last year than a great many Americans make in annual salary. Most of them seem to be well off, even for this part of the country (which has a considerably higher cost of living than just about any place outside of New York City, even higher than Los Angeles).
I’ve been very fortunate in that I am able to keep a pool of fairly regular clients, especially among local business executives, lawyers, and business people who travel to the city on a recurring basis (No, my personal attorney is not a client). And while it is nice to have that kind of stability in my client base, it prevents me from taking on many other clients whom I know would like to book time with me. My primary focus is on accumulating money, however, not seeing as many people as I can.
I do have a preference for developing regular relationships over seeing itinerant clients continuously. Not just from the perspective of having a (relatively) steady stream of money coming in, but it allows me to get to know them, which allows me to serve them better (and has in many cases, allowed me to help clients explore some aspects of their sexual psyche they might not otherwise have done). I develop a comfort level with them, which reduces the amount of stress associated with screening and those first-time meetings.
Most of the guys I see are just regular people; you’d never suspect that they utilize my services if you saw them walking down the street, operating on your brain, or defending you in court. I know that about half of them are married, and I suspect a good percentage of the rest are as well. Some guys don’t have a problem discussing their wives and family with me, while some haven’t mentioned it the first time (the ring outline on their finger gives it away, though).
My favorite clients are those who come to me with a great attitude, have an open personality and open mind and want to explore a bit – those who’ve got something they want to try that they haven’t been able to before. I guess that’s just the natural sex educator in me manifesting itself through this part of my life.
I can sense that many of the guys I see would prefer not to have to pay for my services, but are resigned to having to do so. Some legitimately just don’t have the time or the desire to pursue real relationships. One of my clients is on the road 90% of the time – it’s just not feasible for him to try to pick up someone while he’s on the road continuously.
I don’t keep a “waiting list” per se, but there are several dozen men who’ve (seriously) indicated they’d like to spend some time with me if and when I have an opening, some from as far away as Italy. I try to reach out to the ones who contacted me first when that occurs. It’s quite heartbreaking for me to have to turn down someone who’s just arrived in town and wants to see me on short notice, especially those who’ve indicated they’ve read my blog and seem legitimately excited at the potential of meeting me.
I’ve had to terminate relationships with two clients because they’ve gotten more attached to me than they should have. I’ve only had one person book an appointment with me and not show up at all without letting me know (and that was on my tour in Las Vegas). I get quite a few clients who fly in late in the evening and want to see me once they get settled into their hotel (and with all of the airline delays, often results in rescheduled bookings or the occasional canceled appointment).
In terms of the sex, probably a good two thirds of them have asked to go down on me. About half have wanted in my butt, and maybe 20% wanted to give me a facial. Almost all of them have wanted to go through the basic missionary, doggy, and cowgirl positions, with only about 10% wanting to try some of the more acrobatic stuff (I do get the occasional request to try the piledriver position, though some have to ask me what it is exactly). Probably one third of them can get into the pounding sex, and maybe half of that number have a preference for the rougher, more aggressive sex.
I can count on one hand the number who’ve slapped my boobs with any force. Two have spit on me (with permission); one wanted to play with erotic asphyxiation (I declined due to safety reasons). About nine out of ten are circumcised. I’ve peed on a dozen or so clients, and been peed on by about the same number (not necessarily the same clients). I’ve done bareback vaginal penetration with one client one time, though it has been requested (and higher prices offered) a not insignificant number of times. Surprisingly (to me, at least), I’d not had a single client ask me to sodomize him with a strap-on until I went on tour this past August, though I have had my finger inside a great many male rectums on the job.
I’ve been the center in one blowbang, a handful of sessions with couples, and a small number of doubles with another provider and a client. I’ve never had to use my warning or stop safe words with a client, though I have told clients to cease doing something that was irritating me (almost all of them fingering me incorrectly) or outside my rules of engagement during the sex (and in each case they complied without complaint). I have never once felt threatened or scared with anyone paying for my services.
When I set out in this business, I made the conscious decision to see only a limited number of clients over any given time period. I won’t see more than three or four people in any one week, for example. This was primarily to keep myself from burning out, but it has also resulted in more demand than there is supply. If you paid attention in your Economics 101 class, you know what that means – higher prices.
So my client demographics are obviously somewhat different from Rebecca’s characterization of those she’s seen (though there are clearly similarities as well). Much of that has to do with the differences in how we work. One of the points she makes many times in her book is that she prefers the longer and overnight dates, whereas the two hour assignation is more my style. I’ve been on the occasional overnighter (and out of town a couple of times), but I just don’t have a penchant or a preference for keeping someone entertained for long periods of time like that. She also dislikes anything other than the softer sex – she specifically states that she doesn’t do “PSE.”
I think it is perhaps important to note that my client pool differs significantly from that of most other escorts. With the possible exception of the more aggressive sex, the style and behavior of the people I see is not atypical for other escorts operating in the high end of this industry. The majority of the people who request my services find me through referrals, banner exchanges with other professionals, and most importantly, through my blog and Twitter posts. I haven’t had to advertise any place to any great extent in quite some time now.
If you get the chance, pick up a copy of Rebecca’s book, even if you’ve read those written by other escorts. Hers is the first I’ve read by a British sex worker and it is interesting to see how the work differs from the way it is here in the U. S., as well as the disparity between how she constructs her work personality vs. the way I and others I know do. She has a blog, and a Twitter account, too, by the way, if you wish to keep up with her.


- A Client Website? Last night, I had one of my regular clients e-mail...
- A View from the Client’s Perspective (III) This is the third and final entry in the series...
- New Client Information Section You’ll notice a new menu row at the top of...
- Draft Client Etiquette Post A few weeks ago, I indicated that was I was...
- A View from the Client’s Perspective (I) Many of you have seen my other blog site, My...
Email This
Print This






{ 40 comments… read them below or add one }
Great read, loved getting a bit of a peak into the client base, if all goes well and you end up in toronto I hope to join the client list one day.
I need to get to Toronto to see you and Ashton.
So, when can we expect your book to be published?
In the year 2100.
No plans to do a book right now.
I think you make very interesting points about hobbyists and mindset. I got involved with hobbyist boards in Australia before I even started working, to have a look around so to speak. It has been invaluable in terms of networking, given the legality and lack of checks in Australia, ladies don’t seem to be as close knit as in the US. My career and my life has been enriched by the connections I have made there.
However, hobbyists have threatened me with public outing, stalked me across several mediums and generally made my life more unpleasant than if I had never been involved with the boards. In fact, given that I know a few of them read your blog, I fully expect another public lashing for this post:)
Given that you’ve started touring, do you find that your clientele differ with regards to location? I travel interstate and my clients in one state are very different to those I had previously seen in my home state. For instance, I saw two Asian clients in my entire time in my home state, but at least half my clients are Asian interstate.
However, hobbyists have threatened me…
That’s one of the characteristics of one subgroup of hobbyists – they seem to be all about control. Not all of them, of course, but just enough to give all of them a bad name. Most of the ones I’ve encountered have been pushy, overbearing and arrogant, especially once they find out how much I charge.
Given that you’ve started touring, do you find that your clientele differ with regards to location?
I’ve only toured two cities, and they were close to me. I did get a different “vibe” from the Vegas clients, if you will. But half of the clients I saw in each city were regular clients of mine anyway, there wasn’t a tremendous amount of experience with which to draw any serious conclusions about differences. That is likely to change next year, though.
Interesting layout on the clients. I always thought it might be the older ones who would be more of a trouble but from how it was described there (especially the clingy younger ones or the arrogant younger ones) it sounds like I would be more irritated with them.
Yeah, many escorts won’t even see guys under 30, largely because they tend to be more immature and less worldly. Conversely, though, they tend to be more into the aggressive sex than the older clients.
“I don’t see anyone I can identify as a hobbyist (punters, for you British types) as a general rule. . . . They call them hobbyists for a reason, and I don’t really care to be just one more girl in their list of conquests. ”
That more than anything else stood out for me. I’m not entirely sure why, although the last part of the second sentence is somewhat puzzling. Why would you care whether a client considers you another notch on his belt? What difference does it make? Although I’m not suggesting you provide your service as an automaton, it is a service, albeit a more “personal” one than many, and successful people in a service business don’t always have a particular liking for certain clients.
I’ve read reviews on TER by hobbyists and they generally seem rather boastful, maybe even obnoxious, as they describe their experiences and rate their providers. The providers generally seem to enjoy being rated, especially the ones who get high marks (who themselves boast about them), since it’s good publicity, although that is not a consideration if one already has a steady and full book of business. Is this public promotion of their hobby seen as boorish and distasteful?
You have the luxury, it seems, of picking and chosing your clients, and you are certainly free to screen them on any basis you want. It just struck me that the above quote indicates a desire for at least some personal feeling in your interation with clients. I’m not saying there is anything wrong with that, just that it seems somewhat surprising.
Why would you care whether a client considers you another notch on his belt? What difference does it make?
Well, despite the fact that many people see it as a “just sex” kind of thing, I like dealing with people who want at least a minimal connection of some type. Additionally, guys who see escorts as notches generally have a lot less respect for the women than the typical non-hobbyist (again, generalizing – there are many who don’t suffer from that issue). I won’t knowingly deal with clients who do not respect me as a human being.
Is this public promotion of their hobby seen as boorish and distasteful?
By some providers, yes. Despite it being a commercial transaction, I prefer to keep what goes on behind closed doors private. Some providers don’t care, of course, and if they get generally positive reviews, it will attract more clients to them.
It just struck me that the above quote indicates a desire for at least some personal feeling in your interation with clients.
That would be true, yes. I don’t want clients who see me as just another hole. Anyone can do that (and that’s what causes many to burn out or become jaded).
… it seems somewhat surprising.
Why?
Why? Admittedly, I hadn’t read your gangbang blog until after I posted my comment. But now it seems even more surprising. Do you think the 10 guys will respect you in the morning? Ok, it’s a rhetorical, or perhaps facetious, question. But will a gangbang provide a sense of “connection” that an encounter with a hobbyist doesn’t? Or is a ganbang just a “I need to do this (at least) once” kind of thing? By the way, I am not hobbyist or a gangbanger. At least one of those is by choice. I have been with a few escorts and have been fortunate to have ones who were not only attractive but had very pleasant personalities, which for me is as important as the sex.
The gang bang is a purely personal development kind of thing. – sort of “just to experience it” kind of thing as you described it. I’m not concerned about whether the guys “respect” me when we’re done or not.
Given your last sentence, why do you find it surprising that a provider would be the same way?
I enjoy a provider’s personality over dinner and then like to retire for play time. From what you posted, your trysts are typically two hours, and from what I am able to discern (which may not be accurate) from your tweets, at least some of your clients are wham-bam-thank-you ma’am affairs (lasting less than an hour from the time you are “off” to see the client until when you tweet “fini.”)
Just to be clear, I am not being critical and am not trying to promote my preference. It can well be you find a personal connection with the regularity and continuity of your meetings with the same clients. All I am saying is, I do not see the congruence of your position in that your have an interest in some personal connection but don’t particularly care for meetings beyond an hour or two. That is not your issue. It’s only my question. I will say that, when it comes to the “bottom line, in my experience the personal connection for the provider may be more her feeling of being with a “known quantity” and perhaps relief that the time she puts in is amusing and not a feeling of anything more.
Your travelling client should read about pickup. I’ve found it’s much easier to have a one night stand on the road than at home. Especially if you go to a lot of conferences, which typically feature young, attractive marketing and sales women who are often looking for adventure.
To hear him explain it, he just doesn’t want to invest the time and effort, especially if there’s no guarantee of success. He’s got a very pleasant personality and an awesome sense of humor, and I have no doubt he’d be successful picking up women if he put some effort into it. Some guys just prefer the convenience of a professional relationship.
Almost ALL of my clients are white, 28-40 yrs old, and are below average looking. They all suck in bed and don’t know what to do with their hands, mouth and bodies. Men on “The Erotic Review” are even worse. Because you are at their mercy when it comes to reviews despite the fact that they are unattractive, overweight, horrible in bed and cheating on there wives. I’ve had the pleasure of deflowering at least 12 nervous but lovely men. I’m happily retiring shortly due to getting a full time job. :)
Sounds like you’re ready to leave the industry anyway.
By the way, Tessa, you should consider writing your story for the My First Professional Sex web site. We’d love to read it.
I think I’ll write one of these when I have downtime – I have “different” clientele too. Not in the same way as you, but different from the ‘average’ escort.
Please do. It’s always interesting for me to read about others’ experiences.
I have yet to see an African American client
———————————————————
Just out of curiousity … have you ever been with an African American man? If no, do you have any desire to?
I have not. And I don’t pick my partners based on things like skin color. If I came across an African American man that tripped my trigger, I’d be just as inclined to do him as I would anyone else.
Very interesting!
I honestly do wonder what kind of guys visit escorts but know I’ll never really know unless I do it myself. Which I can’t because I’m a training professional and to be found out would destroy my career before it’s even begun.
I kind of maxed out on the Belle de Jour books for escort fiction, is Rebecca’s book worth a read?
(I would of course read any book you wanted to write, though. ;P)
I think Rebecca’s book is an interesting read, yes.
The only issue I had with it is that she spends a lot of time reminding people that she was promiscuous in her younger years. Maybe that helps her feel better about the work she does, I don’t know.
It’s kind of a parallel with Natalie McClellan’s book where she writes in every third sentence about her use of drugs. The repetitiveness gets a bit old. She (Rebecca) comes across as a “real” person, though, not as a caricature (like Belle’s book, IMO), so it is a very positive addition to the collective work of escorts and prostitutes, and I definitely recommend it.
Natalie McLennan’s book pissed me off. And after all that she works in a spa in Montreal. Good going.
I found your blog post interesting to read Alexa. Thank you for discussing my book on your blog.
I just wanted to reply to your comments and try to explain – for me writing the book was an interesting, lengthy journey of finding out about myself and psychoanalysis . I’ve never really understood why I have taken certain paths in my life and why I have been so different to my family. Writing helped me understand a lot about myself.
I have mentioned the ‘word’ promiscuity maybe 5 times in the 130,000 word (386 page) book, and in reference to my teenage years. It’s not something I am proud of, but I think it explains one of the reasons I didn’t find escorting difficult, it’s mentioned at the beginning when I outlined my life between 15 and 20 and later in the book when I had my first long term boyfriend and I stopped sleeping around and went into my first long term relationship.
I felt it was relevant to my story of becoming an escort, because I think it’s harder to understand how someone with limited sexual partners might adapt to the job of an escort. In the past people have queried how difficult it must be for me to sleep with men who are strangers, the truth is I haven’t found it so, but only because of my past. I have always enjoyed and buzzed off giving people pleasure.
What I learnt with my first long term boyfriend (that I met at 20) is that for me sex is always better with someone when there is a relationship of sorts – whether it’s in my personal life (which is incomparable to any ‘work’ dates) or whether it’s with a regular who I have been seeing a while. So my preference for work dates was always having regular gents.
I hope this helps explain my reasons :)
Bea, thank you so much for stopping by and providing some background on your book. You didn’t need to “explain” anything, though. Your story is your story and you get to tell it how you wish to tell it. It’s always interesting to me to learn how other people see their own lives, and yours is certainly no different.
Good luck with your book, and wherever your life takes you.
I am ready to leave the industry, but I was shocked that when my rates when above $400 I still had the same kind of men, and they too sucked in bed. I thought for some reason that the clientele would be better, but it wasn’t. I’m always surprised when escorts are like “I have the best sex” because the escorts that I actually talk to, pretty much say the same as me. Ckients suck in bed and are pretty unattractive. Go figure.
I’ve had the opposite experience. I changed locale and raised rates and my clientele got better in bed. I had my first multiple orgasm of my entire life from a man who wanted me to MSOG via oral during a 4 hour booking. Personally I’ve had loads of attractive clients that were awesome in bed.
Interesting post. I’m kind of curious as to where i would fall relative to your client list (or Tessa’s or Missy’s for that matter), numbers wise. I participate for some of the reasons already expressed, but to me, her bedroom skills are secondary. If i’m going to repeat, she needs to be good at delivering an “intensely orgasmic performance”. I use the term performance because i’m under no delusions that it’s going to be real on her part so it’s not to satisfy my ego. At least not fully. Fact is, when i search out porn, i search for scenes where the girl seems to not only have orgasms, but have them in above average intensity. And the more the merrier. Likewise when i seek out paid partners, i search for girls who seem to have orgasms in above average intensity. And convincingly. And for the record, 99% of porn to me would fall under the “unconvincing” category, so i’m not an easy sell.
So….just how rare are guys like me as customers?
I use the term performance because i’m under no delusions that it’s going to be real on her part so it’s not to satisfy my ego.
Now, that’s not necessarily true. I get off for real with a great many of my clients, and I know others do as well. Though, of course, sometimes it is necessary to “perform.”
Likewise when i seek out paid partners, i search for girls who seem to have orgasms in above average intensity.
How do you go about that, exactly?
Now, that’s not necessarily true. I get off for real with a great many of my clients, and I know others do as well
Didn’t phrase that as well as i should have. I’ve only been with 3 providers, so my experiences aren’t vast. That said, with 1 provider i’m not sure – could go either way. With a 2nd, i know for a fact she didn’t get off because she was going overboard with the faking. Hate that, and i won’t be seeing her again. And the 3rd, i know for a fact she has gotten off with me. I know this because i’ve been with her enough to know she just doesn’t have it in her to fake it. At all. So this 1 time, at band camp…..
How do you go about that, exactly?
Well, i cross my fingers and hope, mostly. About the only thing i can do is rely on reviews – which i know enough to take with a large grain of salt given the penchant for braggadocio within them. Right now i’m hoping to book with #4 based on a few comments i’ve picked out that i’m hoping subtly indicate there really is a reasonable hope she can provide what i’m looking for in that regard. We’ll see.
Well, good luck.
As a client, your segmentation was interesting to read, and I fall into 1 or 2 categories (as to motivation), and am definitely not vanilla for the most part.
One thing that I would disagree with is your narrow view of hobbyists. I would say most fall into one of the other categories, but there is that hard-core group that is just notching their belts. They never, or rarely repeat, and have to try every new thing out there. I would agree with your assessment of that group, but to lump the rest in with them is a mistake.
Thanks for your articles, I find them informative and titillating. Keep it up!
I agree with Captain Starfish. I felt that the description of Hobbyist lumped all clients with multiple providers in a group that I would not really want to see myself a part of. I tend towards recurring relationships where comfort levels generally make for better sessions. I see new women largely to see if they might be compatible for something ongoing, not as notches. I also don’t post public reviews.
I also fall into a group that sees escorts for practical purposes. Partially, because I can. The economics aren’t daunting. Partially, because I am absolutely not looking for a “traditional” relationship at the moment. One person above suggested “pick ups”. While I have some ability to do that and am told that I am reasonably attactive, finding an intelligent, attractive, highly sexual, non-clingy, fits-a-certain-profile and doesn’t come with any type of drama type of woman takes longer than one might think, and can cost way more than a more direct and satisfying solution.
Tony, the way you characterize your interaction with providers is perfectly fine, and I have no problem seeing people like that/you. As my reply to the Captain suggests, it is a narrow segment of the population that I prefer not to entertain.
One thing that I would disagree with is your narrow view of hobbyists.
I think several people have construed my comments to refer to anyone who sees a succession of escorts, and that wasn’t my intent.
The “hobbyist” I was referring to is the type who not only seeks out every new provider who comes into the market, but takes great pride in getting the first review up and critiquing minutiae in her performance. I know some who talk about providers behind their backs to others, inside the business and out. I prefer not to do business with those kinds of people. There’s a difference between a true hobbyist like that and clients who just like seeing escorts.
Perhaps I should’ve been a bit more clear about that.
Thanks for another great insight into your work. I also took away the fact that if I’m traveling out your way, I need to let you know well in advance :)
Yes, ma’am.
For some reason I would think that the majority of clients would fall into 2.5 categories:
1) Less attractive/socially awkward of all ages
2) Married men (like me) who want more attention (last sex I had with the wife was about 3 months ago, and it’s not due to either one of us changing our looks, it’s just what happens with kids etc).
2.5) Upper class (married or single) who want more–you know the type, competitive in all fields, etc. It’s 2.5 because these men are not exclusive of 2.
As an aside, I’ve been thinking that the real market for providers is the daytime incall for married guys who can duck away from the office. Am I wrong?
I’m not sure where I fit into your categories. Probably a bit of all of them. I’m in my 20s, I’ve seen working girls since a long-term relationship had a horrible ending (the only girl I’d ever been with, etc.) more out of a sense of boredom and missing the touch of a woman. I’m not socially awkward (quite geeky, though) or unattractive, I’m a normal unsuspecting person really. I guess the one that fits me most is “Guys looking for no-strings sex and companionship,” although unlike a lot of men in their 20s I’m not aggressive in the bedroom at all. I’m a total pansy! You can ask @LusciousLani that one …
{ 3 trackbacks }