Bye Facebook

by Alexa on May 1, 2009 · 16 comments

As many of you know, I’ve decided to delete my Facebook profile.  There are a variety of reasons why I’ve taken this step.  The straw that broke the camel’s back was their refusal to accept an ad for a movie about three lesbians, ostensibly because it violated their terms of service with respect to advertising.  The ad itself is extremely tame, especially when compared to many other ads on FB (a fact pointed out by the web site linked above).  Facebook eventually capitulated and reversed the rejection, but the entire incident speaks to the way Facebook and its idiot staff run the place.

It’s not just that, though.  Facebook’s administrators have deleted numerous accounts, including those of many sex workers and porn stars.  And, granted, many of these folks may have violated FB’s terms of service regarding the types of photos they’ve put up, but in many cases, I know for a fact the material they’ve posted is not anywhere near so extreme as to justify having months or even years of work pissed out the window.  I had my original FB account deleted without any notice whatsoever.  In my current account, I’ve had a dozen or so photos deleted because they “violate [their] terms of service.”

This is interesting to me because I’ve gone out of my way to keep from posting anything that might be offensive to anyone or that might show too much skin or anything akin to that.  Nothing I’ve put in my profile there showed as much skin as what you’d see on any beach in the United States.  Nothing.  Yet, from time to time, I get these stupid little notices threatening to delete my account again because I am violating their TOS.  It’s even more interesting because all of the ones that have been deleted were posted when I first created the account, so, at least theoretically, when the pervs who cruise through user accounts have gone in and removed one, the others should’ve stood out the first time through.  Regardless, it’s a fucking pain in the ass to have to walk on eggshells to satisfy some fuckwit moderator’s subjective determination as to what’s out of bounds, and who gets to delete my work without any need for justification whatsoever.  If they delete a photo, you get a notice, but they don’t tell you why they deleted it.  Fuck that.  They are a private enterprise and can do what they want, but I sure as fuck don’t have to participate, and I no longer will.

It’s interesting to me when people raise the specter of government censorship.  I’ve long held the opinion that government censorship is not an issue to us much any more because we have those who comprise the substantial infrastructure of the Internet censoring what we say and do to begin with.

Take Google, for example.  I don’t use Google as my search engine any longer.  Why not?  They believe that the word clitoris is a dirty, nasty word that will corrupt the minds of children.  That’s right, the medically accurate term for an anatomical feature on a woman is a naughty word and needs to be censored lest we pollute the minds of the young people.  When you put your Google search into “safe mode” (as you might for your child) and search for penis, you get millions of results.  When you search for clitoris, though, guess how many you get?  Not one fucking result. I could understand pussy, cunt, or any of the other euphemisms for the woman’s naughty bits being handled that way, but the legitimate medical term for it?  Fuck you.  So I’m not using Google again until they change that ridiculous bullshit.  Google also caved in and acquiesced to China’s insistence that they censor what their people can see, as opposed to doing the right thing and saying they wouldn’t help the Chinese intentionally restrict information.  Google is complicit in the suppression of a people as I see it.

The bullshit we went through with Amazon a few weeks ago is another good example.  While the mouthpieces at Amazon say it was a “glitch,” well know that is fucking bullshit.  Glitches don’t affect material specifically aimed at gays and lesbians, womens’ reproductive health, and books about feminist issues.  Unless and until Amazon comes clean with a legitimate explanation and an apology, I’m not buying anything from them again.  I’ve bought hundreds of books and other items through their web site, and I’ll be forced to pay more for many things I buy now, but I am not going to support a company that actively works to censor what people are able to find when they’re looking for books and materials on specific topics.

There are other examples (PhotoBucket deletes “naughty” photos, even if you have your albums set to private where no one can see them), but I don’t feel like wading through all of them.  Some of it is just getting absolutely ridiculous.

At any rate, back to my original rant about Facebook, it’s not so much that I hope to engender some kind of response from them or get them to change their policies or the way they’re implemented because I know they don’t give two shits.  I just don’t give a fuck and am not going to deal with a place who’s business practices I think are a bit more than unreasonable.  So, goodbye Facebook.

I know some of you followed me on FB and I’m sorry for any inconvenience.  Feel free to friend me on MySpace (If you add me on MySpace, include a note that you’re adding me from reading my blog – it’ll get you added faster), and of course, I spend a lot of time on Twitter as well.  See you there.  ;-)

No related posts.

Email This Email This Print This Print This

{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Lorelei May 1, 2009 at 7:48 pm

Facebook recently changed their friends page too, I’m not sure if you got to see that before you deleted it. You can no longer see a list of your recently updated friends pages- you only get the main home page ‘feed’ so to speak. Sites that became popular became popular for a reason, whoever is running that site is messing up. That’s really upsetting about the AD considering the other ones that are approved, which are equally as ‘explicit’…See you on twitter.

Reply

2 AprilBlackBox May 1, 2009 at 7:58 pm

Alexa,

Well said! The lack of human interaction when a profile is suspended is senseless to say the least. It takes an incredible amount of time and energy to build a meaningful profile and connect with people. The connection is what all these social sites are for, no? Though Facebook is a free site, one would hope that they would give the courtesy of informing on why EXACTLY they suspended your profile.

I had no idea that Google moderated their searches like that, thank you for pointing this out.

I wish you great success and look forward to keeping tabs on you via Twitter!

Cheers,
April

Reply

3 steve May 1, 2009 at 8:22 pm

I had no idea that google restricted search results for clitoris, no wonder why I’ve had such trouble finding it.

It’s quite interesting how all these large internet companies are making these narrow minded decisions that seem only to have negative repercussions.

You might want to add flickr to the list. They’ve had a problem with classifying artistic implied nudes with amateur porn taken on a camera phone. All this while groups dedicated to shooting women’s feet from afar without their knowledge flourish unabated.

Twitpic too I think has deleted a bunch of adult entertainer’s accounts.

Internet “safety” is a joke.

(I wrote my Master’s dissertation on facebook and google privacy concerns. It’s not directly related to the censorship debate but I feel like it’d interest you if you’d care to read it)

Reply

4 Martin May 1, 2009 at 9:57 pm

I’m not a myspace user (hated it from day one) so can you explain what they are doing right unlike facebook? I imagine they must have similar content terms and whatnot. I totally understand the frustration with FB, they are total fuckwits. but at the same time it is such a valuable tool for me that I put up with the bs. For now ;)

Reply

5 Alexa May 1, 2009 at 9:58 pm

Martin,

I’m not a myspace user (hated it from day one) so can you explain what they are doing right unlike facebook?

For one thing, I have the exact same set of photos there that I had in FB, and not a one of them has been deleted.

Reply

6 Thais May 1, 2009 at 10:35 pm

After a moment of initial outrage I actually did some googling and found this blog entry:
http://brookcentres.blogspot.com/2009/02/google-response-on-status-of-clitoris.html
“Last week someone called to say it was a technical issue and they were going to look into it. He agreed to contact me when it was sorted. I will keep you informed.
He also said that he was pleased to receive a letter which was supportive of work on sexual rights, as a lot of their feedback in this area is complaining.

While I may not be buying the “technical issue” explanation, I found that last bit very interesting. I think people like us need to speak up more. Send a letter, file a complaint – but do it politely, with good arguments and without making them defensive. Google operates in a cultural continuum, and we want to change that continuum we need to be heard to balance the conservative extremism.

Reply

7 Alexa May 1, 2009 at 10:46 pm

Thais,

While I may not be buying the “technical issue” explanation, I found that last bit very interesting.

I’m not buying the technical issue, either. With all of the technology Google has behind its operation, there’s no way in hell that’s due to a “technical problem.” If they can’t solve something that simplistic, perhaps they shouldn’t be running the Net’s primary search engine. Maybe if they’d be so kind as to explain how a technical issue might create such as problem, I’d be satiated. And yes, I did send them a nice (really, it was nice and polite) e-mail a few months ago about this issue when it first became public. Still haven’t heard from them on it.

Believe it or not, many sex education classes (especially those that are abstinence only based) don’t even mention the word clitoris AT ALL. Why not? Because it is the only organ in the human body (of either sex) that has only one function – pleasure. They can’t mention it without discussing female sexual pleasure, so they leave it out altogether.

I don’t know if there’s any kind of connection there, but it sure does seem like such an odd coincidence any way you look at it.

Reply

8 FupDuckTV May 1, 2009 at 11:29 pm

Screw Facebook! I’ve never liked them and it will take alot for me to change that opinion. These are exact reasons that I host my own blog, images and content. No censorship….

Reply

9 Samantha May 2, 2009 at 3:48 pm

I hate the FB restrictions, I hate that things there randomly disappear, I hate that they never ever do anything when I complain about a racist or sexist group yet they absolutely cater to the Christian right and other such extremists. I got really pissed because a while back–a few of my friends got in trouble for being Gay and saying it in individual threads but the hetero “I love fucking my boyfriend” groups are allowed to remain.. Plus FB became ugly and irrelevant to me. I’m on MySpace again though, its far friendlier and has many more options.

Reply

10 Michael May 2, 2009 at 4:31 pm

There’s the supposed insider story about the employee of Amazon France, and the rumors that Amazon’s “report inappropriate content” feature was abused (if that is indeed the case, they may not want to admit it).

In any case, they quickly fixed the issue, which is the important part. Do I really want to second-guess what may or may not have happened?

Reply

11 Samantha May 2, 2009 at 4:50 pm

@Michael –I wanted to believe them, really I did, but they stated in their excuse that it was across the board with all Amazon sites–I have screenshots from Amazon.Ca during that time taken at the same time (within no more than 2 full minutes apart) as screenshots from Amazon.Com and it was not an issue in Canada which oddly, has legal GLBT marriage and full rights, workplace protections, etc. I posted the pics if you’d like to see: *here*

Reply

12 Aaron May 2, 2009 at 9:48 pm

Wow, that’s outrageous. I can’t believe FB would refuse the film. How sad. Haha, You’ll be glad to know that Oprah based an entire episode teaching parents how to give their children the “sex talk.” They did use the word clitoris as well as stimulation etc.

Reply

13 chase May 3, 2009 at 2:17 pm

the google search on clitoris is quite interesting to me.
what search engines have you found most useful and least censored?

Reply

14 Wolf May 3, 2009 at 11:36 pm

I loved following you on facebook, sad to see you leave, but I do understand you! I admire the way you are following your principles, and living your life!!!! You are an incredible aware person, and I hope I will have the pleasure to meet you one day:) I am not sure if I am able to get MySpace here at work, but I will try:)

Reply

15 Zounds May 5, 2009 at 4:29 am

Google is a publicly traded company, their shareholders never would have accepted them staying out of the world’s biggest market. When they went into China they increased the number of websites accessible inside China and when something is blocked for censorship reasons Google tells the user what has happened. No other service does this. They have actually improved the freedom of information within China.

AFAIK.

Reply

16 Angel May 7, 2009 at 10:07 am

This was an enlightening post. I knew about Amazon, but not about Google or the fact that Facebook actually actively censors people’s profiles. It’s sad that we have to encounter the same pathetic, censorial attitudes on the internet as we do in real life and, I feel, so much more dangerous. It’s bad enough having self-righteous people to try to decide for everyone what children should be able to witness, but doing so on the internet infantilizes us all. We shouldn’t be reduced to the level of children. And I am so sick of the female body being treated like it is pornographic. More than just puritanical attitudes about sex, these actions evince the disdain our society has for the female body.

Reply

Leave a Comment