Nathan Creitz, over at Church Ethos, posted an article concerning the legalization of prostitution a few days ago. He was examining the issue and offering a “solution” to the “problem.”
His assessment suffers from at least two critical flaws, however. First, much of his information comes from web sites run by the anti-prostitution crowd. Despite widespread criticism and debunking of Melissa Farley’s malpractice (or, as she refers to it, “research”), people still use her information to support a variety of punitive actions against sex workers and their clients. In the comments on Nathan’s article, I was able to demonstrate a couple of problems with her “facts,” but you know, once someone reads something that supports their positions it tends to stick with them as the gospel (no pun intended, Nathan). In fairness to him, he did indicate that I’d shed some light on the subject and cause him to rethink some things, though.
The second flaw is a lack of basic understanding of the sociology surrounding prostitution. For example, he originally made no distinction between street workers and those who sell sex privately. His understanding of the world, which again was based largely upon what he took from Farley’s misinformation, was that street workers comprised the bulk of those who sell sex. When I pointed out that, in reality, they only constituted about 10% of those who sell sex, he was astounded and didn’t believe me until I pointed him to a source.
He also had a rather simplistic outlook about the ability to develop programs to get women out of sex work: He’d educate them and find them jobs. I pointed out that many of us actually have degrees, including many with advanced degrees (and that is not uncommon for street workers as well). I also explained that, unless and until you find women jobs making the kind of money they can selling sex, you’re not going to have any serious impact on the industry using that approach. Most sex workers can make in a couple of hours what they would working an entire week at most other commonly available jobs, especially as young women working their way through college.
In the end his solution, basically, was to decriminalize the selling of sex and criminalize the purchase of sex, as if this was something new. Hmm, where have we heard this before? Oh, yeah, Sweden. And while the specific results there are a bone of contention (because of claimed biases in the various studies done on its results), the net result is that prostitution still takes place in Sweden; it just does so underground now. Sex workers in Sweden will tell you they are far less safe under the current law than they were previously (when prostitution was not illegal).
Another fact that escaped Nathan was that it is already a crime in many cities and states to buy sexual services. They often fine the Johns, take their cars away from them, and force them to attend “training” programs about STDs and respect for women (ignoring male and transgender sex workers). That, too, has yet to quell prostitution to any significant degree. There are a few places on this planet where buying or selling sex will get you executed, and yet even that doesn’t stop people from exchanging sex for money and other services or goods of value. So assuming that the mere criminalization of the buying of sex is going to magically stop it is woefully naive.
As we went back and forth in the comments on his blog, he narrowed the scope of his discussion to those who are coerced into prostitution and “the children,” or the minors who engage in sex work. Let me state unequivocally that I support anything we can do to get anyone who doesn’t want to be doing the work, or who doesn’t have any business in the work out of it. That includes anyone who doesn’t do it consensually or who is incapable of consent, for whatever reason (age, mental defect, altered state, etc.). I just want us to adopt some serious approaches that are, you know, going to work. I’m tired of seeing lip service paid to this issue by fucking no-nothing politicians and others. Nathan’s intent is good, but he’s just not familiar enough with how everything fits together to be able to develop and articulate a rational response. He gets credit for trying, though.
So what would work? I don’t think anyone knows the specific answer to that with any certainty. Quite clearly, the simple criminalization of the buying and selling of sex doesn’t work. It never has, and it never will. For the life of me I can’t figure out why otherwise rational people can’t seem to wrap their heads around that.
First and foremost, we need to recognize that many sex workers do what they do because they enjoy the work and/or like the kind of money they can make from it, accept that and move on with addressing issues related to those who want or need to get out. And, when someone makes a decision to enter sex work, allow them to make it. Some may hate it and get out; others may like it and stick with it for a while. Let them do their thing and go on with their lives unencumbered by the idiocy of the way we currently treat those who engage in sex work. Wasting time arresting, prosecuting, and warehousing those who do the work consensually wastes money and resources that could be much more effectively applied to getting others out of the work.
We also need to recognize that those forced into sex work are not criminals, but victims, and deal with them accordingly. New York and California, two of the most progressive states in the country, are leading the way by enacting laws that treat minors caught up in sex work as victims. We need to extend this to apply to anyone, adult or minor, who’s coerced into sex work. Arresting the prostitute, charging her with a crime, and penalizing her does absolutely dick to help her get out of the business. In fact, it perpetuates it. She’ll have to earn money to pay for attorney costs, fines, and court fees when she gets done. Let’s see, what would she do when she needs to make some money to pay all of that? Yep, prostitution. See the problem with this approach? The epitome of nonsense.
There’s going to need to be some kind of social support system to help those who want out to get out; there’s just no way around that. Perhaps it might be modeled after programs used in drug rehab (which would, by necessity, have to integrated into whatever we come up with), and include training, job placement assistance, parenting skill development (for those with children), financial counseling, and other programs that might support someone wanting out.
So my basic proposal as to what we might do includes the following. I’m sure other people will be able to add to this or expand on the points I’m including, but they could, and should, serve as a jumping off point for additional discussions on the subject.
1. Decriminalize the consensual exchange of sex for something else of value. This is a no-brainer and nothing else anyone ever proposes in any form will work without taking this first step. Don’t enact new laws regulating everything, just decriminalize it and perhaps pass some basic regulations governing where it can’t be done. Some people point to places where prostitution has been legalized as examples of it “not working.” The failure is directly related to the onerous regulations that are placed on the work, though, rather than its simple decriminalization. The Netherlands is an excellent example of this, as is Nevada. Requiring prostitutes to be held as slaves by brothel owners for the entire time they’re in town to work and restricting their movement isn’t much better than making it illegal to begin with. New Zealand’s decriminalization is often pointed to as a potential model for use here in the U. S. With a few tweaks it could easily work here as well as it has there.
2. Strengthen and enforce human trafficking laws already on the books. Trafficking is an entirely separate issue from prostitution and the two shouldn’t even be linked. Human beings trafficked into the world of sexual slavery are NOT prostitutes – they’re slaves. Period. Penalties for trafficking human beings, especially minors, should include life imprisonment for those responsible, full stop.
We can point again to The Netherlands for an example of how this can be mismanaged. Even though prostitution was legalized there, there is still a trafficking problem. People will point to that and say, “See, legalization of prostitution does nothing to inhibit the trafficking of humans into prostitution.” The disparity stems largely from porous borders and the way the country understands and enforces it’s immigration and border laws, though. Combine this with the narrow manner in which prostitution can be carried out in the country (i.e., only in brothels) and it becomes easy to see why legalization has done little to inhibit the flow of sexual slaves into the country. This is why I mentioned above that if you don’t decriminalize the work, nothing else you do will matter.
3. Strengthen and enforce existing laws against coercion of someone into prostitution, and make them specific to the intent to coerce. As it stands right now, most state laws are written to criminalize anyone “living off the proceeds from prostitution” or something similar to that. Though originally intended to be used to prosecute pimps, the net result is that it often criminalizes the prostitute’s family and other legitimate business associates (including, technically, their children, by the way). Prostitutes need support services just like any other business person, and there’s no reason to criminalize those who legitimately help them do their work (schedulers, madams, drivers, etc.). Make it a crime to force or coerce someone into prostitution and enforce that law, but allow the prostitutes to spend their money as they see fit.
4. Redirect all of that money being used now to arrest, prosecute, and jail sex workers toward social programs to help those wanting to get out of the business. This would, by necessity include drug rehab, domestic abuse counseling, job training, and other educational programs as I discussed above. If we don’t develop some social support mechanisms to provide them with some legitimate path out of the work, they’re not likely to go anywhere until they die (or hit the jackpot). The overwhelming majority of those who want out of prostitution are street workers – those engaged in “survival” sex and who have to earn a quick buck to score their next hit or put food on the table. Use these funds to allow faith-based groups and other community-based organizations to develop programs to help these folks, evaluate them over time and see what works, and use those as models for additional programs.
All of those, even collectively, are not going to be the panacea I’d like it to be, and I am sure open to other suggestions for ideas that might have a legitimate shot at working. To be valid, any idea would need to:
- Not treat consensual exchanging of sex for something of value as a crime,
- Not place undue restrictions on those engaged in sex work,
- Recognize as valid an individual’s decision to engage in sex work, for whatever reason they elect to use,
- Recognize the differences between prostitution-related concepts and those wholly dissociated with prostitution (i.e., trafficking, etc.),
- Recognize the factors/pressures that send people into “survival” mode (including drug addiction) and incorporate appropriate mechanisms for dealing with these.
So what say ye? Anyone have any thoughts about other approaches we might use to actually allow consensual sex work to flourish while inhibiting trafficking, coercive manipulation, and mistreatment by the justice system?


- Towards a New Proposition K Many of you recall that Proposition K, which would’ve basically...
- Decriminalization vs. Legalization There’s been a lot of discussion in a variety of...
- National March for Sex Workers’ Rights December 17 is International Day To End Violence Against Sex...
- Dear Mr. Spitzer In case you haven’t heard, Eliot Spitzer is back in...
- Donna Hughes Advocates the Abuse of Sex Workers When I began writing this article, I was going to...
Email This
Print This






{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Have you ever thought of becoming an advocate? Very rarely do you see an online discussion involving sex work and religion that does not deteriorate into name calling and worse.
You both deserve kudos for keeping the thread on topic and civil. Imagine if more people with opposite views took the time to talk and listen. People may not agree on the major issues of prostitution, but the common ground, human traffiking and coersion, are two issues that seem to be agreed on, and could be worked on from all sides. Imagine that, a world where people can agree to work on some common issues, while still disagreeing over a larger isse.
You should both consider doing a panel discussion tour, and take your show on the road. :)
The amount of ignorance concerning prostitution is absolutely shocking, a huge amount of people I know have their entire conception of prostitution formed from “Pretty Women” and the news media.
Education is important and the progression of society’s view of prostitution will go a long way to finding a solution. Like you say there is no sweeping change that will fix everything. The first step is to definitely recognize there are different classes of sex work.
Street walking and sketchy brothels are absolutely deplorable and I feel that the practice gives the profession as a whole a bad name. To me these are the women most “at risk” from their position and those least able to get help or change their lifestyle if that’s their wish.
A huge part of why street walking and other “low forms” of sex work exists is because there are men who see sex as a commodity to the point where they want to get the most bang for their buck. These guys are never going to pay 1000 p/h or even want more than 20mins. Their demand gives a niché to dangerously cheap forms of sex work. There needs to be an allowance in the law and in society’s framework for a relatively low priced alternative for guys who can’t afford more than 100 dollars or so per encounter. Safe brothels run by honest people, and that build a good reputation. These exist in some cities in the UK from what I’ve heard. Try googling “Sandy’s Superstars” and Manchester. While not technically legal, the police turns a blind eye to it. It looks very professionally put together. Make safe and regulated brothels a more attractive alternative to street walkers etc. by providing good customer service, clean environment, quality experiences through independent reviews etc.
Having places like that, and cooperating with law enforcement in terms of guaranteeing the girls aren’t coerced and everything is above board so to speak will help the industry’s image tremendously. Guys will be knocking down the doors to a clean and safe place that is essentially legal and carries the guarantee that nobody is coerced and those that work there are willing.
Hopefully unsavory prostitution will crumble in the face of a better option. Treating sex workers as victims and guaranteeing their safety so they are able to report being mistreated would be key. Like you say of course.
Forgive me if I’m being ignorant but there isn’t that much of a risk on the level at which you operate. The main problem is people viewing what you do as equivalent to being a street walker, or if it gets out that you slept with an attorney general. So, education is important so that people can recognize that not all prostitution is negative. Hopefully Sasha Grey will open a few eyes and minds in The Girlfriend Experience. I guess there needs to be better data protection laws and privacy barriers to protect the identities of clientele? Having legal status would go a long way to prosecuting the theft of private data.
I hope some of what I said makes sense and it wasn’t too long.
Every time I think about this I come to the decision that this is about Judeo-Christian values, nothing more, nothing less.
As an example it is “OK” according to those values to get a job in an abattoir and kill animals, to join the army and kill other people, to become a judge or a corrections worker and to condemn people to death and execute them, to approve the bombing of civilians in countries far from my own, to approve the torture of other human beings.
It is “OK” to make films that contain the most appalling violence and it’s “OK” to show those films, you just better not make or show a film that involves consensual sexual intercourse.
I happen to find many of the things listed above abhorrent. I don’t find anything inappropriate about the trading of sex through prostitution save for the two things that Alexa has identified: those unable to consent and those coerced or trafficked.
It’s not “OK” (under the J-C code) to engage in the trading of sex, except of course that there is an argument that good old Judeo-Christian marriage is an economic and financial arrangement, and of course in that frame the “trading” of sex is applauded, because of course that’s what marriage is all about. Marriage is purely and simply the trading of sex for economic and financial value and stability – at least in it’s current western conception.
A massive double standard exists.
De-criminalise prostitution so that resources can be focused on what really matters and so that criminals have nothing to get their hooks into.
Mike
I’m sure this post has nothing to do with my recent comment ;) No, seriously, it seems like you’ve been thinking about writing this for a long time.
I felt like I was reading a peer-reviewed journal study. Good job, and keep up the good work.
Also, couldn’t agree more with everything you said. Change is the only consistent thing in our world, and time allows change to happen. Not that we shouldn’t keep pushing for these changes now, but I’m convinced that someday – eventually – these changes in popular thought & policy will indeed see the light of day.
Some people think it’s prudent and feasible to rid the world of sharks by draining all the oceans. And never mind all the fish that will die.
Keep up the good work, online and elsewhere.
Also, I wonder if any large church body would be willing to offer single mothers $150 an hour to stop sex work? When the church lifts a finger, it tends to be pointed at someone. The situation, sadly, reminds me somewhat of the current wave of feminism.
Alexa
I originally had a too-long, rambling draft of a post to you. Much of it was my extreme frustration at concepts that I intellectually or emotionally disagree with such as:
- morality through legalization
- the need for the church to promote it’s standards of behavior as “right” to the exclusion of other individual’s standards
- the downgrading of sex-workers and their clients, in the minds of many, to be depraved and immoral
- the reduction of many arguments against sex work to the clichéd “think of the children” appeal to emotion logical fallacy
I really didn’t have the time, nor the knowledge you have, to address Nathan’s points better than you did. My thought, in comparison to your’s, added no value.
The key point from my post now is Thank you. Hobbyists, both providers and clients, need advocates and specifically intelligent, rational, thought provoking advocates such as yourself.
Rebecca – I fear that a panel discussion / roadshow would be protested out of existence. I have very little faith in humanity anymore.
“Quite clearly, the simple criminalization of the buying and selling of sex doesn’t work. It never has, and it never will. For the life of me I can’t figure out why otherwise rational people can’t seem to wrap their heads around that.”
I would suggest it is the same as with the decriminalization of all recreational drugs. People who know nothing, and wish to know nothing, of the actual effects of decriminalization are happy to stick with the propaganda that if drugs were legal, we’d all be out of control junkies and society would cease to function, or become intolerable.
With sex I suppose the idea is that if everyone is free to have sex whenever (without the trauma of attracting/keeping someone), then relationships will become far less intimate in general and society will cease to function, or become intolerable. We would certainly be less insecure or easily manipulated. Maybe it’s more like state-sanctioned homophobia – within a macho-centric society men must only be attracted to ‘clean’ ‘innocent’ women…or we’re doooomed dooooooomed!!!
i guess hookers are the new gays!
‘rational’ people are so described because they have a survival instinct that tells them to ascribe to what is least controversial when lacking in personal knowledge. the weak minded, antagonistic comments you’ve been receiving from small-minded trolls recently would testify to that.
Steve,
I don’t intend on seeing “Girlfriend Experience”, because usually Hollywood movies that have prostitutes in them always have the them end up dead, or in a mental institution, or leaving the profession. I am not spending twelve bucks for the usual Hollywood scenario.
However, if you see the movie, and the character ends up continuing her profession at the end of the movie, then it will be a twelve dollars well spent, because it will be the first time this has happened in a Hollywood production. Let me know what happens.
Great post Alexa! Very well thought out and reasoned. We may never see this occur in our lifetimes, but certainly change will only come from thoughtful pieces like this.
I’m linking this post to my Facebook page, okay? Well said, as always.